Harry Potter

[Jimenem]

It's coming out this friday here! Hooray! I'll probably go with my brother. thats ok though, at least i get to see the movie!

[KC8t80]

I'll probably skip one or two classes that day to go see it.

[Eskarpin]

I will have to expect until Friday 25..... but I already buy the entrances.

[dina]

well i dunno when but iam there maybe i will go 6 times to satisfy everyone ma bro,ma colleage friends,ma old friends,ma cousins,lol the list is biiig i wanna go alone but cant be
do u think that there will be big diffrences between the book & the movie?

[Eskarpin]

It more important in the books they are used to respecting it, the things less important eliminate them or they change

[KC8t80]

I read the review in the SF Chronicle. and they said there are a few changes from the book like how Harry got involved in the competition even though he didn't want to be in it. I think there a few other ones. heres a link.

http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cg%20f=/c/a/2005/11/16/DDG8BFO9E11.DTL&type=movies[/url]

[KC8t80]

I just saw this past weekend and I thought it was great. the best one yet. I was just lucky enough to get a seat.well i don't know about the third one because i haven't seen it.

If anyone has seen it.....what is ur favorite part?
Me its basically any seen with Ron's brothers in it.

[Jimenem]

Yeah the weasley twins are hilarious. The movie was good. But it was a dissappointment for me. They left all the cool stuff out!!! Like the monsters in the maze, and they changed waaay too much. It just didn't do the story justice. And they left out the 1000 galleons Harry got for winning the tournament. That is key, because he gives it to the weasley twins to fund their joke shop! How do they expect to get away with that! And in this movie Dumbledore was mean! He's never mean! He's never clueless either! Yet they portayed him as a bumbling idiot in this movie!

Anyway, I'm done ranting. I think one of the funniest parts was when Harry was in the bathtub, and Myrtle visists him. That was hilarious.

[Eskarpin]

I not yet have seen the movie, but when I saw the 3, memory that left disappointed because itself not al seemed book.
But the movie is really good, although have not many details.

[KC8t80]

Well Jimenem, when i read the review the director wanted to focus on the characters growing up and reaching puberty and its changes. I do agree that is a shame with what they left out(though i never read the books) but maybe they'll put those scenes in the DVD. Plus I am sure Rowling gave her seal of approval on how to have the movie protrayed.

[Jimenem]

Your right, but the stuff I don't like was mostly the changes they showed, not the stuff they left out. Like the way dumbledore acted in the movie perturbed me. But it was by far the best movie yet. . ... reguardless.

[thecablegal]

The first movie was the best in my opinion, because that was the most magical. We'd never seen Hogwarts before and it was like, "Wow, I want to be there!" I've seen all of the first 3. I'm thinking about going to see the 4th, but I don't know...

[Eskarpin]

You are right the first movie is the most special one. .... I love the scene of the train.

[kasper]

I want to see it... someone take me. I could either go with Chad... and I already have him reserved(lol) for The Chronicles of Narnia and Fun with Dick and Jane, ...and the other dude I'd ask to take me... always gets the wrong idea. And girls are so moody I can't get along with them. UGH. If I had a car and a job I think my problem would be solved

[KC8t80]

ya i don't like how they portayed dumboldore this time around. ans to add to that they had to use a different actor because the original guy passed away. very sad!