Oh my!!!!... a cute young Jim

[quirky]

If I saw LESS pictures of those lovely blameless kids I'd feel better.

No one should have to grown up in the middle of that shit.
"Take just ONE more picture please?"

[fluffy]

but who is to blame exactly??.......Angelina for giving them a chance ?......or the press who hound them?.............or the public for buying the magazines that publish the pics and give the hacks a reason to hound them???...............

fluffy

[mav]

I'm so damn CYNICAL about everything in Hollywood.

I don't blame you. 'People' and such can do that ...lol... everything in Hollywood is reduced to a caricature.
-

[quirky]

but who is to blame exactly??.......Angelina for giving them a chance ?......or the press who hound them?.............or the public for buying the magazines that publish the pics and give the hacks a reason to hound them???...............

fluffy

Think of every celebrity who is a parent....

Are we SEEING all of THEIR kids??

[fluffy]

so do we blame the hack who are hounding them into the ground??.........or the public for giving them a market??............

fluffy

[cotton]

Actually I blame the people who buy them(yes i know) and Angelina and Brad. Why do I blame them? Cause obviously they or somebody who is close to them is leaking info about thier whereabouts to the media.

I am not saying they adopted those kids for attention but I do feel bad for those poor kids. Poor Maddox should be going to preschool and making friends. She is so over protective of them yet she has them in lime light constantly. There is no reason why they can't be a bit more low key. Jim does.

[quirky]

Oh I totally realize that I am not judge and juror....but I blame the "parents".....their kids are TOO EASY for photogs to access.

The kids have almost become "celebrities" themselves....and they are too young for that relentless press hounding.

There's Sean Lennon

There's Jane Carrey

There's Chelsea Clinton

Sometimes there are stories, but not the tabloid after tabloid graphic pimping of them.

Do we really WANT to see pics of those kids? Or are they jamming them down our throats....are they an accessory? Someone needs to say, "Angelina...that's not a Gucci purse...that's your SON!~!"

[fluffy]

ahhh..........but Jane didn't have 2 megastar parents........Melissa and Jim kept her protected from the Hollywood frenzy........

but fair play to Ange and Brad..........it can't be easy......Ange is away to pop and the press are going crazy..........i hope they find somewhere reasonably private to live and bring up the kids........

fluffy

[quirky]

but Jane didn't have 2 megastar parents.

She had ONE. And it looks like he did a fantastic job.

[mav]

As long as the kids are WITH the parents, a few pics isn't going to scar them for life or anything!?

And frankly you're blaming the cook for having too much cake.....lol
-

[fluffy]

well said Mav..........

fluffy

[quirky]

No...I just figure the parents have clued media into too many photo ops.

[mav]

I wouldn't know. I have eschewed most media. All I know is that ordinary kids also have to grow up in different kinds of challenges, so I cannot look at the photo-ops as really grave.

But getting back to 'I want....'

hmmm...."Tell me what you want. What you really really want?'

[cotton]

But getting back to 'I want....'

You mean "Oh my!!.....Cute young Jim"hehe

[quirky]

I wouldn't know. I have eschewed most media. All I know is that ordinary kids also have to grow up in different kinds of challenges, so I cannot look at the photo-ops as really grave.

I guess I'm too maternal....I really think KIDS should be protected. As a star (or member of a BB) you have to face the photogs or people knowing about you....but LIFE?

Ordinary kids have enough challenges in life!!

In Belgium, my Dad made me do too much....but it would have been a real pain in the ass if there had been photogs!

These poor kids (much like the Olsen twins) are being set up to be paparazzi targets FOREVER.