Bruce Almighty 2

Discuss other upcoming Jim Carrey movies (not confirmed/rumours).
User avatar
Conor
Kick-Ass 2
Posts: 1432
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 4:14 pm

Post by Conor »

ok i can see your point now.....
User avatar
Arutnev Eca
The Dead Pool
Posts: 54
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2004 3:17 pm
Location: Valencia, Spain

Post by Arutnev Eca »

grinchy steve wrote:But now it's different. In 'Evan Almighty' it's more a new storyline with a lot of new chances to make this movie hilarious. It opens a lot of doors for funny scènes. Besides that, this time there is nobody replacing Jim Carrey, it's another Character.
Wasn't that exactly what happened with The Mask 2? I haven't seen it (and never will), so correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought nobody replaced Jim Carrey as Stanley Ipkiss in that movie. It's just a new guy with the same mask surrounded by a bunch of new guys.

About the movie, I can't see "Evan Almighty" working at all. Steve Carrell is funny, of course, but the plotline sounds incredibly weak to me. Now God wants a second flooding and picks Evan Baxter?? Why Evan? I'm expecting a "I need a new guy for some reason, so I'm picking you because you were around last time" kind of explanation.
So this is another sequel of a Jim Carrey movie without Jim Carrey I won't see. I hope they reconsider it, and cancel this waste of time.
User avatar
ComedyJim34
Once Bitten
Posts: 30
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 3:38 am

Post by ComedyJim34 »

Oh no! This movie is going to ruin Bruce Almighty. Like Son of The Mask did to The Mask.
User avatar
grinchy steve
Kick-Ass 2
Posts: 1467
Joined: Tue May 22, 2001 6:30 pm
Location: Belgium
Contact:

Post by grinchy steve »

Arutnev Eca wrote:
grinchy steve wrote:But now it's different. In 'Evan Almighty' it's more a new storyline with a lot of new chances to make this movie hilarious. It opens a lot of doors for funny scènes. Besides that, this time there is nobody replacing Jim Carrey, it's another Character.
Wasn't that exactly what happened with The Mask 2? I haven't seen it (and never will), so correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought nobody replaced Jim Carrey as Stanley Ipkiss in that movie. It's just a new guy with the same mask surrounded by a bunch of new guys.
Well, the thing is, that new guy tries to be The Mask as we know it. That doesn't work. Also, it's simply a weak cast, a weak story and an idiotic film.

Steve Carell IS Steve Carell, not someone that want's to be a second Bruce. He can do his own thing.
EDIT : Forgot this, honestley, I didn't think the storyline about Jim turning in to god because he complains a lot (hell, was he? I know different guys :D ) promised a good story. But that's the beauty of comedie. The story isn't exactly the highest priority if you can laugh your ass off.

Sorry, bad English
Last edited by grinchy steve on Thu Sep 01, 2005 10:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Conor
Kick-Ass 2
Posts: 1432
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 4:14 pm

Post by Conor »

exactly....its not like someone is trying to be a character of jims....again...
User avatar
Arutnev Eca
The Dead Pool
Posts: 54
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2004 3:17 pm
Location: Valencia, Spain

Post by Arutnev Eca »

grinchy steve wrote:Well, the thing is, that new guy tries to be The Mask as we know it. That doesn't work. Also, it's simply a weak cast, a weak story and an idiotic film.
Ok, all right. If they were trying to imitate Jim Carrey's Mask, then there's a big mistake.
grinchy steve wrote:EDIT : Forgot this, honestley, I didn't think the storyline about Jim turning in to god because he complains a lot (hell, was he? I know different guys :D ) promised a good story. But that's the beauty of comedie. The story isn't exactly the highest priority if you can laugh your ass off.
Well, I think it had much more potential. He complains a lot and God was like "Let's see if you can do it better". That's an interesting premise, in my opinion. Simple, but interesting.
But now it's second flooding time (that alone doesn't sound good to me already. It looks to me like an easy resort.), and it looks like God will choose Evan as a second Noe just because Bruce isn't available and he was a funny secondary character in the other movie (He won't say that in the movie, of course, but that will be the real reason). I just don't see it strong or interesting enough. Besides, Evan sure was funny in Bruce Almighty, but I'm not sure this character would work as the main character.

Of course, I can be wrong, but for the moment I don't like the idea.
User avatar
fluffy
JCO Staff
Posts: 20742
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 3:03 pm
Location: Scotland
Contact:

Post by fluffy »

well personally i'm for it...............it's a different take on it........Toms directing and hell, if Jims not going to do it ...why not make it with someone else??.............

i think it'll do quite well.............watch this space........

fluffy :lol:
Fluffy
User avatar
Conor
Kick-Ass 2
Posts: 1432
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 4:14 pm

Post by Conor »

eaxctly....i mean as long as they were in the original/
nicesock!
Ace Ventura: Pet Detective
Posts: 176
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 2:12 pm

Post by nicesock! »

I think this movie could be very funny. Steve and Tom are creative people in their own ways, yes even without our beloved Jim, they are still very clever. Just imagining some guy trying to build an ark in New York City, is a pretty funny sight. SO I am sure it will be great.
User avatar
Canadian Jayne
Sonic 3
Posts: 8151
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2004 9:47 pm
Location: somewhereoutthere,Ontario, Canada
Contact:

I still don't like the floody, floody thingy

Post by Canadian Jayne »

God said he wouldn't do it again. I just don't like the floody, flood thing.
I believe fire is next. Why not go that route. Water has been used.
User avatar
Conor
Kick-Ass 2
Posts: 1432
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 4:14 pm

Post by Conor »

yeah the chicago fire....
User avatar
portuguese_girl
Mike Hammer: Murder Takes All
Posts: 70
Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2005 4:36 am
Location: portugal
Contact:

Post by portuguese_girl »

the film will be called Evan Almighty (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0413099/)
[url=http://imageshack.us][img]http://img318.imageshack.us/img318/8456/best9er.gif[/img][/url]
User avatar
Countess Olafina squalor
The Majestic
Posts: 415
Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 5:14 am
Location: 31ST street, 5 downtown lane.
Contact:

RE: Bruce.

Post by Countess Olafina squalor »

wierd. I kinda pictured it to be Jim getting his godly powers back on a vacation in greece and meeting Zeus.
yours sincerly, Countess Olafina equalor
Twigggy
Bruce Almighty
Posts: 487
Joined: Tue Oct 28, 2003 3:07 am

Post by Twigggy »

Some other poster mentioned "God promising never to flood the earth again," and they're right. That's why he created the rainbow. Anyways the first Bruce Almighty was ok--it's my least favorite out of all Jim's movies directed by Tom; the ending bore me to tears. And the only reason why I kinda' enjoyed the first Bruce was of course some very funny scenes with Jim Carrey, and good acting by Morgan Freeman.
This movie will probaly bomb without Jim Carrey.
User avatar
fluffy
JCO Staff
Posts: 20742
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 3:03 pm
Location: Scotland
Contact:

Post by fluffy »

nope...............on the back of the 40 year old Virgin Steve Carrell will have another hit...............it's separate from Bruce now........

watch this space........................... :wink:

fluffy :lol:
Fluffy
Locked