well im' very happy that little game is over and in particular Muccino is OVER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
WOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Jim IS SAVED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 |  |  |
 |
Game over for "A Little Game"
55 posts
• Page 3 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4
IT?A A BEAUTIFUL NEW
horton hears a who
Hopefully his bad luck is over, Jim now deserves the opposite, a lot of good luck! I agree Jim will survive and thrive and even though they disagree about actors having too high pay checks, he deserves every penny he earns.
KC8t80: thank you for reassuring me, very kind of you. if you contact, i'll hunt you down and gut you like a fish, if you want to fax me press the * key"
Same, please let Ripley go ahead. I love Tim Burton, he is an amazing director and Jim is a brilliant actor. A perfect combination. Please let it go ahead!
if you contact, i'll hunt you down and gut you like a fish, if you want to fax me press the * key"
Re: horton hears a who
you are correct about the salary issue: anyone who's taken an economics course in school understands why exorbitant salaries for movie stars and sports figures are justified.....people go to the movie/game/show/tournament just to see THAT person. They're the one that sells the tickets....! It's as simple as that. 
They would not have been paid that high amount in the first place if they were not worth it. They got massive box office sucess meaning their salary goes up. Simple to understand, why all the sudden problems to our top actors, especially Jim
if you contact, i'll hunt you down and gut you like a fish, if you want to fax me press the * key"
it's all relative to the amount a film is expeted to make.........they can't expect the stars to get a couple of million while the movie rakes in $400 million..........
morally that would be wrong........it would be exploitation fluffy  Last edited by fluffy on Sat Oct 07, 2006 10:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Fluffy
Exactly! If it wasn't for them acting in the film, people would not go and see the film. You do not go to see a film becasue of the script writers or director (except Tim Burton!), you go for the actors. If they don't get the money they rightfully earned, then it is morally wrong. You can't expect an actor to carry on making films on a low wage if there films are taking in more than triple the amount they are making. Afterall it is a business and they deserve their fair share of the profits.
if you contact, i'll hunt you down and gut you like a fish, if you want to fax me press the * key"
Possibly don't want to do the "same ol' dame old"
Being different is what makes Jim unique, I think he likes
change and challenge? Correct me Jim if I'm wrong. Perhaps they wanted something very different than what has ever been. Still would like to see this happen.
I agree with you completely, and I think it is what Jim is doing, he likes to expereiment in the films he does, like any actor, they like and need variety to stay on top of the business as well as being happy themselves. I wonder what it was exactly that made both Jim and Cameron drop out. if you contact, i'll hunt you down and gut you like a fish, if you want to fax me press the * key"
Real or no Real....
that is the question,
were they really going to make this or not???? Reason or no reason, we'll keep wondering 
It all is rather confusing, isn't it?
if you contact, i'll hunt you down and gut you like a fish, if you want to fax me press the * key"
Yes, very...
or in England you would say...
Quite.(I think) The mystery is still a mystery.
55 posts
• Page 3 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests  | |
 |  |
