Congratulations to Katy Holmes

Here is where you discuss everything under the sun, just keep it clean.
User avatar
Jimenem
Sonic 3
Posts: 4337
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 5:43 pm
Location: Lost in the dark receses of my own imagination.
Contact:

Post by Jimenem »

Well there are pro's and cons, the beurocrats want to make sure that the family they go to can provide for them and will take care of them, however you're right it does prevent alot of needy children from being adopted.
User avatar
fluffy
JCO Staff
Posts: 20742
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 3:03 pm
Location: Scotland
Contact:

Post by fluffy »

except it's actually much easier to catch rabies in Britain than adopt..........
.....no REALLY, IT IS..............LOL :lol: :lol: :lol:

fluffy :wink:
Fluffy
User avatar
Clemmy
Kidding
Posts: 1741
Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 2:12 am
Location: Wherever my imagination takes me

Post by Clemmy »

Jimenem wrote:Well there are pro's and cons, the beurocrats want to make sure that the family they go to can provide for them and will take care of them, however you're right it does prevent alot of needy children from being adopted.
No doubt that children should be adopted by fit, caring families, but the service is way to slow... too much paperwork... too little efficiency... :wink:
"Friend is a second self." -- Aristotle
User avatar
fluffy
JCO Staff
Posts: 20742
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 3:03 pm
Location: Scotland
Contact:

Post by fluffy »

it's recognised that 8 is the cut-off age for adopting kids........before that they can fit into a family and assimilate into the unit..........
After that they are reckoned to be imprinted with behavioural issues and virtually unadoptable..........
it's sad.......but the system needs to be overhauled.......

fluffy :wink:
Fluffy
User avatar
Clemmy
Kidding
Posts: 1741
Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 2:12 am
Location: Wherever my imagination takes me

Post by Clemmy »

fluffy wrote:
except it's actually much easier to catch rabies in Britain than adopt..........
.....no REALLY, IT IS..............LOL :lol: :lol: :lol:

fluffy :wink:
Two possibilities come to mind fluffs... the system doesn't work at all or there are too few children to be adopted, which would be a good thing, actually...

I read an article not long ago about a british couple who adopted two chinese girls, sisters if I recall, because the adoption process was much faster outside the country. The article also touched on the increase of multicultural families in Britain because of adoptions.
"Friend is a second self." -- Aristotle
User avatar
fluffy
JCO Staff
Posts: 20742
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 3:03 pm
Location: Scotland
Contact:

Post by fluffy »

but what bites me is that the British Social services will keep children in appalling family situations just to keep the kids with their junkie/alcoholic /violent parents...............kids have died in horrific cases where they were kept with the scumbag parents............
yet decent, kind , honest people can't adopt for love nor money because they might be too old (ie over 30 ) or other trivial reasons.........
so we have a dilema..........should kids stay in horrific homes with their natural parents.............or go to decent homes but with new parents.......

there's no easy answer...........but somethings gotta be done........

fluffy :wink:
Fluffy
Post Reply