sianlee wrote:Is anyone finding it a bit worrying though that results came back positive? And as in then why didn't he tell her before doing it?
No, definitely not.
What I find worrying is that he either has someone faking his medical records/tests, attributing someone else's results to him or his medical records have been made public and sold to some shitstain of a lawyer. *That's* worrying and absolutely disgusting, not to mention highly illegal.
As I said on the other thread, wtf is going on with this certainty that he had herpes and gonorrhea and since the crazy mother came on the scene, that switched over to chlamydia and the gonorrhea was never mentioned again oh and Hep A gets added for good measure (which isn't even an STD) And then they declared that they actually had his test results in their hands (apparently without feeling they need to say how) and he's conveniently under a different name but his birthday is the same (again, convenient). Oh, yes and apparently the Daily Mail has seen these too. ALL in the absence of any court case/judge ..nothing. This is just a desperate claim at the moment. So, how, HOW would they obtain such information.
But let's say for the sake of argument, this test WAS legit. Well, for a start - it would prove nothing. As I say, Hep A, isn't an STD and there's no way of ever proving that he transmitted the other two to her or that he willingly did so. They'd been seeing each other for months by the time this was an issue and he *allegedly* took this mythical test, so where would be the proof that he consciously did anything?
He also may not have known that transmission can occur inbetween outbreaks etc..
And Chlamydia? Well, most people aren't aware they have that due to the lack of symptoms.. antibiotics and that's gone within days. Done.
And what evidence is there to go on from her side? A few dubious texts and a letter. No proof at all of what she had or where she acquired it from and finally and most importantly, even if these claims *were* true - in this scenario - these evil pieces of ditch filth are claiming they are crowing about this because this is why she committed suicide? No. You cannot hold someone accountable for a person's suicide nearly three years after such an event. That is ludicrous and grossly unjust. And they know this; this is why they are attacking him publicly so he'll cave in to make them stop and pay them off.
So, in summation - what I'm worried about is Jim and the effect this is having on him. I'm also worried about the legal, moral and ethical implications of either faking a medical test or obtaining an innocent person's medical details without consent and imparting it to the tabloid press for the purpose of blackmail and extortion.
Every time I have to discuss such personal matters about him so publicly, it pains me to do so. On the minuscule chance he or someone he knows may see this - I'm sorry that it's having to be done and I'm just so sorry that you're suffering through this. Keep on keeping on and you'll emerge even more stronger and more beautiful at the other side. xx
"The lotus flower blooms most beautifully from the deepest and thickest mud"
