Response from JT-

[fluffy]

because there's no need to be nasty.............she's feeling depressed enough without everyone trying to make her feel worse.............

JT was/is upset...........ok she may have said stuff about Jim we don't like but she was hurt and upset............
But for the record yes, i think perhaps she went OTT at times........but she's paying for it now...........

so i think folk should lay off her and give her time.........
far better that we can provide a supportive community for each other than have someone in pain and ostracised...............because THAT'S when crazy things happen.........think about it!!.............

and it doesn't just apply to JT........it can be anyone .........this is a supportive community.................

fluffy

[thecablegal]

I cannot support someone who goes too far though Fluffs.

Yes, you can be obsessed in your own little way, but we have been made to feel jealous, and we have been belittled (sp?) on here by JT. She's made a LOT of us angry, and she's upset a LOT of us.
Then, when she feels like it, she comes on here and expects our sympathy, when she has treated most of us like dirt.

Is that fair?

I feel depressed (may I say, never about a celebrity), and I don't come on here expecting everyone's sympathy. I tell the people that I know. I don't expect everyone to put nice comments, and make me feel better. JT clearly does. She started this thread to get attention, and that isn't fair on any of us. Some of us really don't care how Jim's bodyguard spoke to her.
Most of us have attempted friendship with JT, but she's ruled herself far too superior to speak to any of us. Priya was blocked, she didn't even bother saying hello to me, and others have simply cut off becuase of the horrible things they've had said to them. It angers me that now she wants all this sympathy (over something ridiculous), we're supposed to just watch people giving it!

And besides, we shouldn't have to worry about giving our opinions on here cos it might upset someone. I've had really nasty things said to me on here, as have other people.

LIFE GOES ON!

[fluffy]

i guess.................

but i think it's less about what she thinks about Jimmy and more about how she has perhaps angered some people on previous occassions.............

it makes more sense to have someone supported (regardless of who it is) than leave them to their own devices........better to keep an eye on someone.............

peace
fluffy

[quirky]

See what happens when you try to make a thread veer towards the humorous side?

I like JT. She has NEVER been mean to me and in my time here I haven't seen her be mean to anyone else. She's a member of this community.

She has talked with ME on the phone.

Cablegal - you have had spats on here and nasty things to say to people too. But no one has launched at you like I'm seeing people launch at JT.

And yeah, I like everyone. If there's an underdog, I'll champion it. If someone's being attacked, I'll jump in and say I think it's wrong.

Diversity is what makes life fascinating. Do I have to quote Rodney King?

[george]

look..we are here to discuss about Jim and not to fight. on the other hand if someone behaved bad to someone else this is unacceptable. it seemed i missed some things here but i can say:
peace! and behave good to each other, i can't find a reason for someone to act in an oposite way

[fluffy]

i guess you're entitled to your opinion Cablegal...........

But Quirky and i are together on this one............

if anything really mean is written about anyone, and yes that means Jimmy i will delete.........

but if someone is vulnerable and in danger of doing anything crazy we can't help and moniter them if they are ostrascised.........

This goes beyond personal differences.................

i'm sure you understand how important this is now Cablegal .........read between the lines...........

fluffy