Game over for "A Little Game"

manuela493 · Post by **manuela493** » Fri Oct 06, 2006 4:58 pm

well im' very happy that little game is over and in particular Muccino is OVER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
WOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Jim IS SAVED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

shamaho · Post by **shamaho** » Fri Oct 06, 2006 5:46 pm

I guess you could say it wasn't really without consequence either, huh?!?! Jim will survive and thrive, that's a given....who the heck is Muccino, again?

emilystagg · Post by **emilystagg** » Fri Oct 06, 2006 10:49 pm

Hopefully his bad luck is over, Jim now deserves the opposite, a lot of good luck! I agree Jim will survive and thrive and even though they disagree about actors having too high pay checks, he deserves every penny he earns.
KC8t80: thank you for reassuring me, very kind of you.

grinchy steve · Post by **grinchy steve** » Fri Oct 06, 2006 10:51 pm

I'm crossing my fingers for 'Ripley'.

emilystagg · Post by **emilystagg** » Fri Oct 06, 2006 10:56 pm

Same, please let Ripley go ahead. I love Tim Burton, he is an amazing director and Jim is a brilliant actor. A perfect combination. Please let it go ahead!

shamaho · Post by **shamaho** » Fri Oct 06, 2006 11:03 pm

emilystagg wrote:Hopefully his bad luck is over, Jim now deserves the opposite, a lot of good luck! I agree Jim will survive and thrive and even though they disagree about actors having too high pay checks, he deserves every penny he earns.
KC8t80: thank you for reassuring me, very kind of you.

you are correct about the salary issue: anyone who's taken an economics course in school understands why exorbitant salaries for movie stars and sports figures are justified.....people go to the movie/game/show/tournament just to see THAT person. They're the one that sells the tickets....! It's as simple as that.

emilystagg · Post by **emilystagg** » Fri Oct 06, 2006 11:40 pm

They would not have been paid that high amount in the first place if they were not worth it. They got massive box office sucess meaning their salary goes up. Simple to understand, why all the sudden problems to our top actors, especially Jim

fluffy · Post by **fluffy** » Sat Oct 07, 2006 12:49 am

it's all relative to the amount a film is expeted to make.........they can't expect the stars to get a couple of million while the movie rakes in $400 million..........
morally that would be wrong........it would be exploitation

fluffy

emilystagg · Post by **emilystagg** » Sat Oct 07, 2006 10:12 pm

Exactly! If it wasn't for them acting in the film, people would not go and see the film. You do not go to see a film becasue of the script writers or director (except Tim Burton!), you go for the actors. If they don't get the money they rightfully earned, then it is morally wrong. You can't expect an actor to carry on making films on a low wage if there films are taking in more than triple the amount they are making. Afterall it is a business and they deserve their fair share of the profits.

Canadian Jayne · Post by **Canadian Jayne** » Tue Oct 10, 2006 3:13 pm

Being different is what makes Jim unique, I think he likes
change and challenge?
Correct me Jim if I'm wrong.
Perhaps they wanted something very different than what
has ever been.
Still would like to see this happen.

emilystagg · Post by **emilystagg** » Tue Oct 10, 2006 10:06 pm

being different is what makes Jim unique, I think he likes
change and challenge?
Correct me Jim if I'm wrong.
Perhaps they wanted something very different than what
has ever been.

I agree with you completely, and I think it is what Jim is doing, he likes to expereiment in the films he does, like any actor, they like and need variety to stay on top of the business as well as being happy themselves. I wonder what it was exactly that made both Jim and Cameron drop out.

Mia · Post by **Mia** » Wed Oct 11, 2006 1:18 am

I've wondered the same thing; I agree with you Em and Canadian Jayne.

Canadian Jayne · Post by **Canadian Jayne** » Wed Oct 11, 2006 5:27 pm

that is the question,
were they really going to make this or not????
Reason or no reason, we'll keep wondering

emilystagg · Post by **emilystagg** » Wed Oct 11, 2006 11:33 pm

It all is rather confusing, isn't it?

Canadian Jayne · Post by **Canadian Jayne** » Thu Oct 12, 2006 4:51 pm

or in England you would say...
Quite.(I think)
The mystery is still a mystery.

Jim Carrey Online

Game over for "A Little Game"

IT?A A BEAUTIFUL NEW

horton hears a who

Re: horton hears a who

Possibly don't want to do the "same ol' dame old"

Real or no Real....

Yes, very...