


Post by Anna Chalova »
ha-ha-hafluffy wrote:lol......i'd be the silly one with the kite....lo........
fluffy
Like The Canterbury Tales?fluffy wrote:lol...........you can see the comedy value in a pile of rabid women in sundresses, sunhats and huge waders all making their way in a pilgrimage up the beach.......doing Ace impressions etc......with a very pink lady and one attached to a kite................lol........![]()
![]()
![]()
fluffy
Post by Michele Hernandez »
Post by carreyd away »
I agree, the beaches belong to everyone. We have a similar situation where I live when these people built gi-normous houses on beachfront property and tried to ban public access like they tried in Malibu. The area they built near is a very popular surf spot. It's like moving next to an airport and complaining about the noise.Michele Hernandez wrote:Its the high-tide line, carreyd away. So as long as the tide isn't at its highest, you can be on dry sand. Otherwise, it would be against state law.
Check out this link
http://www.clipi.org/blog/archives/172
The beaches belong to everyone, no-one owns sand ni the ocean. It is about access, that's what the issue is about.
The California Coastal Commision defines the tide-line as the wet sand area from the ocean to the land. When a wave crashes and rolls onto land, then rolls back to the ocean, the highest mark from the highest wave is the "tide line" until the sand dries. So you'd have to go down to the beach during high tide to get closest to the houses. That's what I meant by wet sand, not the sand that is submerged in the water... I guess I wasn't being very clear...In California, all beaches are public below the high tide line.
Post by Canadian Jayne »
Post by carreyd away »