Jim Carrey Statement about Lawsuit
- sianlee
- Horton Hears a Who!
- Posts: 705
- Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2005 9:46 am
- Location: Wherever Jim is, I am
- Contact:
Re: :(
Yes!!!! I was thinking the same!! Who would write "Jim Carrey!" As the name on a phone?! And after all of his tweets... his writing is rather bland. Very short, it's like it's not him at all. We might not know him, but that certain seems like an older man writing who doesn't prefer texting by the sounds of those messages.
Has anyone added up this ex husbands name to see if it adds up to 23???? That's our answer.
Has anyone added up this ex husbands name to see if it adds up to 23???? That's our answer.
[img]http://i92.photobucket.com/albums/l29/quieroandres/jim23jco.jpg[/img]
Re: :(
sianlee wrote:Yes!!!! I was thinking the same!! Who would write "Jim Carrey!" As the name on a phone?!
It could just be naiivety on Cathriona's part and I know the iphone has the option to include first and last names on its contacts but I think it's odd to be dating someone so high profile and easily identifiable and have their full name on your phone. If not just Jim, why not, Jim C or another name entirely?
Re: Jim Carrey Statement about Lawsuit.
As I said, the messages are just very private examples of completely non-contextual communications between two people having a difficult time. The only real proof of anything from them is how despicable Mark Burton is.sianlee wrote:I know you're all right. I guess for me it was just one of those moments that were like "woah" when you see all the messages and stuff. Don't get me wrong, I am one of the first people that will critize something. But it's like... we're all those messages fake? I know they've skewed the truth... but it just seems to paint a new image for Jim for me. I know he's human and all, I just wish he got a scan done and proved to the cost that he didn't have any of that. Because then the whole case is false! Why can't Jenny speak out about this?
There's no new image of Jim. He isn't hateful or nasty - he's having a very private exchange with someone over an issue that we nothing about. I've certainly been there and I'm sure most people have.
Being forced into divulging very private details about his medical history will prove nothing. Burton is just hoping that Jim will be so keen to preseve that privacy that he'll pay him to shut up. As I said, there's no shame at all in having an STD (and Jim is under no obligation to share whether he has or hasn't with anyone) but there is an overwhelming amount of shame in being Mark Burton.
Oh, blimey, don't invoke her. That's the last thing we need.sianlee wrote:Why can't Jenny speak out about this?

Re: Jim Carrey Statement about Lawsuit.
Indeed it is.sianlee wrote:The world is so sad

Re: :(
Yep, very odd to hold on to texts for that long.fluffy wrote:who keeps 2 1/2 year old texts?...........i think you are spot on when you said you thought the 'organisation' had been keeping tabs on Jim for possible future use.![]()
And, yes, sadly I think that's what they were doing. I think they may have been privvy to everything all the way along. There's no way they would've approved of her dating him or not pressured her about it. They hate 'outsiders' having an influence over their members - particularly high profile influences that have publicly mocked them and rebuffed their advances in the past.
I think the main and only reason they could've encouraged it is so they can 'keep tabs' on him and possibly drain money from him via her.
Re: Jim Carrey Statement about Lawsuit.
Jenny's got nothing to do with this so i hope the media leaves her alone.
Fluffy
Re: Jim Carrey Statement about Lawsuit.
Jenny who?fluffy wrote:Jenny's got nothing to do with this so i hope the media leaves her alone.
His ex?
Oh please... her ship has sailed.
I'm a guardian of the spark...
I'm a God damn and proud good fan... and I love it! = )>
I'm a God damn and proud good fan... and I love it! = )>
Re: Jim Carrey Statement about Lawsuit.
Truth will come in do time.sianlee wrote:I know you're all right. I guess for me it was just one of those moments that were like "woah" when you see all the messages and stuff. Don't get me wrong, I am one of the first people that will critize something. But it's like... we're all those messages fake? I know they've skewed the truth... but it just seems to paint a new image for Jim for me. I know he's human and all, I just wish he got a scan done and proved to the cost that he didn't have any of that. Because then the whole case is false! Why can't Jenny speak out about this?
I'm a guardian of the spark...
I'm a God damn and proud good fan... and I love it! = )>
I'm a God damn and proud good fan... and I love it! = )>
Re: Jim Carrey Statement about Lawsuit.
Have you read 'The Unbreakable Miss Lovely'?fluffy wrote:Yeah, i've been reading about Scientology for years too....i think i've read every book ever written about it and if the members actually knew the truth, there would be nothing short of a revolution within the organistation. But they're brainwashed drones who are told the rest of us are basically Satan and they are made to believe that it's the voice of Satan, rather than reason and common sense, which argues against them.....if only they really knew the truth.........
Re: :(
i kinda think they wanted them to hook up, they've been after Jim long before Cat came along...i'd go so far as to say it wouldn't surprise me if the organisation conveniently 'arranged' for Jim and Cat to 'bump' into each other. Regardless, they should let the poor girl be remembered for the good things and not for this. Mark is despicable.There's no way they would've approved of her dating him or not pressured her about it.
Fluffy
Re: :(
You could very well be right. It's unlikely that she would do anything without their approval and that could have only come if a) there was access to Jim in some way - for the ultimate gain of money or recruitment or B) If, like you say, they'd engineered the whole thing in the first place.fluffy wrote:i kinda think they wanted them to hook up, they've been after Jim long before Cat came along...i'd go so far as to say it wouldn't surprise me if the organisation conveniently 'arranged' for Jim and Cat to 'bump' into each other. Regardless, they should let the poor girl be remembered for the good things and not for this. Mark is despicable.There's no way they would've approved of her dating him or not pressured her about it.
And you can bet your last penny it's not just Burton behind this.. he's had assistance from her vile friends. For sure.
- sianlee
- Horton Hears a Who!
- Posts: 705
- Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2005 9:46 am
- Location: Wherever Jim is, I am
- Contact:
Re: Jim Carrey Statement about Lawsuit.
What about the video footage currently revealed? Cocain and 50 Shades Of Jim



[img]http://i92.photobucket.com/albums/l29/quieroandres/jim23jco.jpg[/img]
Re: Jim Carrey Statement about Lawsuit.
Ah, what a surprise. Radar - the sister of National Enquirer, who also ran this shite last month.sianlee wrote:What about the video footage currently revealed? Cocain and 50 Shades Of Jim![]()
Absolute.fucking.idiots.
Sugar means....... sugar. The guy has talked about how it effects him and his moods several times in the past. That's why he cut it out of his diet.
Jesus...
Apparently that makes him depraved. WTF..
And if this legendary video exists, then it confirms that Burton broke the law by fake marrying her. End this awful character assassination and arrest him for his crime please.
- sianlee
- Horton Hears a Who!
- Posts: 705
- Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2005 9:46 am
- Location: Wherever Jim is, I am
- Contact:
Re: Jim Carrey Statement about Lawsuit.
Yeah it didn't say that it could help Jims case.... I didn't know Jim said that before. But reading that article doesn't it make sense that they were talking about Coke? Weed and sugar do t seem to go hand in hand in the same sentence... and what's with the Christmas thing? Sugar over Christmas :O maybe... is it just me or does it really sound a little bad? Still don't get me wrong, I'm still all for Jim to make it through this and hopefully everything is disproven!!
[img]http://i92.photobucket.com/albums/l29/quieroandres/jim23jco.jpg[/img]
Re: Jim Carrey Statement about Lawsuit.
No, trust me. It's sugar. And you don't 'eat' cocaine. I'm sure even trash sites like that realise it too, but they're taking such glee in printing this BS that they don't care.sianlee wrote:Yeah it didn't say that it could help Jims case.... I didn't know Jim said that before. But reading that article doesn't it make sense that they were talking about Coke? Weed and sugar do t seem to go hand in hand in the same sentence... and what's with the Christmas thing? Sugar over Christmas :O maybe... is it just me or does it really sound a little bad? Still don't get me wrong, I'm still all for Jim to make it through this and hopefully everything is disproven!!
It's not really bad. It's just some National Enquirer shit that's been rehashed.