Number 23 comes in at 90....

Happygal · Post by **Happygal** » Fri Jul 20, 2007 7:18 pm

As the worst of the worst!

http://www.rottentomatoes.com/features/ ... id=1168260

This really saddens me.

Lena · Post by **Lena** » Fri Jul 20, 2007 7:27 pm

ts they can put there lists where the sun don't shine.
I love the movie!

Happygal · Post by **Happygal** » Fri Jul 20, 2007 7:32 pm

I know! I seen something on TV, where they said The Number 23 came in at number 2 as the top 5 worst movies! This was also by Rotten Tomatoes. But I don't care what they say, I'm still going to watch it when it comes out on DVD.

sprousefan23 · Post by **sprousefan23** » Fri Jul 20, 2007 11:23 pm

Well rotten tomatoes don't know what their talking about! The Number 23 was good, and no stupid list is gonna change my mind!

carreypunkrawker · Post by **carreypunkrawker** » Sat Jul 21, 2007 3:31 am

sorry but I agree with Rotten Tomatoes. It could have been way better than it turned out. But the only movie that's really at the worst of the worst was Me, Myself & Irene. That one really sucked.

lammy · Post by **lammy** » Sat Jul 21, 2007 4:36 am

Didn't dumb and dumber come out after " Me , myself and Irene " ?

carreypunkrawker · Post by **carreypunkrawker** » Sat Jul 21, 2007 3:39 pm

no. Dumb and DUmber came out before MM&I.

alisonsarah · Post by **alisonsarah** » Mon Aug 06, 2007 4:52 pm

I was thinking that maybe they wrote that article because they're not used to seeing Jim in this sort of role. What do you all think?