Page 2 of 4

Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2005 9:50 pm
by JT Carrey
Tom said it MIGHT happen, he's not sure yet himself

Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2005 9:54 pm
by Conor
oh ok....thats cool. thanks for the info jt.

Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2005 7:22 am
by carreyd away
Hey JT, just out of curiousity, what film is Tom doing now? Are you having fun working on it?

Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2005 9:34 am
by JT Carrey
it's called "Accepted" I only worked 2 days on it but I'm hoping to work on it again, he's only producing so he's not directing or anything and he's not that busy on set so I have plenty of opportunity to chat with him

Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2005 12:34 pm
by Conor
thats awesome..........wow.....ask tom if hes doing any other sequals without Jim.....lolol jk.

Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 6:33 pm
by Jimenem
At least we can all be satisfied to know that if there where ever to be any Lemony snickett sequils Jim said he would have no problem doing those. But bruce 2 without bruce??????? Geeze that sucks! he should at least make a cameo!

Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 6:35 pm
by Jimenem
JT, tell Mr. Shadyac that he's wasting his time with that sequil, No one will go see it apart from a few shadyac fans. No one has yet to pull of a Jim sequel without Jim succesfully.

Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 6:43 pm
by JT Carrey
if I get a chance to see him again soon, I'll mention my opinions on it...but we'll see

Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 6:48 pm
by Conor
also ask him if there is any possibility of Jim making a cameo.

Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 6:53 pm
by JT Carrey
we'll see

Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 9:18 pm
by Conor
ok thanks for all this info jt.

Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2005 4:55 pm
by jims_lost_daughter
mi hate how they keep doin this, making these crappy sequels, without him even in it. Especially, the mask 2, that is horrid, they ruined it, ahhh, i hate it and i would NEVER watch it. dumb and dumberer didnt see as bad as the mask, but still, grrr. now this?

Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2005 11:07 pm
by Conor
i know....there better at least be a Jim cameo in bruce 2 because duh its called bruce almighty......now lets see no bruce- no making sense.

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2005 2:44 am
by EternallyJIMS
yeah im not for it. steve carell...hope i spelled that right.... is a funny guy!! anchorman and 40 year old virgin are great!! and he was great in bruce too. but bruce almighty is Jim's movie. i think it would be dumb to make this sequal without Jim!! its his movie!!!!..... i understand why Jim wouldn't want to do a sequal and why steve would want to do this movie.... but it just sounds like a bad idea..... Jim is the best don't mess with him or try to "reproduce" one of his movies... anyway hope that made sense...
have a B-E-A-utiful morning, afternoon evening and night:)

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2005 10:05 am
by grinchy steve
Well, for once I disagree. Right, The Mask 2, Dumb and Dumberer, they all suck big time. But now it's different. In 'Evan Almighty' it's more a new storyline with a lot of new chances to make this movie hilarious. It opens a lot of doors for funny scènes. Besides that, this time there is nobody replacing Jim Carrey, it's another Character. A character that actually may work. Steve Carell is simply Hilarious and he sure is highly needed fresh meet in comedy land. A very talented comedian. This not really directly sequel has a big chance of succeed in what it's supposed to do. Make us laugh. A lot.