Re: :(
![Post Post](./styles/jco2/imageset/icon_post_target.gif)
sianlee wrote: Why not just publish it already you know?
Jesus, no.
He should in no way shape or form be bullied or blackmailed by these scumbags. Let them proceed with their bullshit 'lawsuit'. They're not getting any money either way.
Welcome to the Jim Carrey Discussion Board
http://jim-carrey.com/forum/
sianlee wrote: Why not just publish it already you know?
EvaAraujo wrote:AdaL wrote:EvaAraujo wrote:
I don't give a f*** about scientologist and frankly if that's the reason this is happen it's just a detail that doesn't matter anymore.
The fact that is happening is enough for me.
.
The fact that this is a Scientology thing can't really be ignored though. You're dealing with a certain kind of person and a certain prescribed set of rules and objectives.
You'd have to be a batshit scientologist to think that you could get anywhere but mocked with this ludicrous attempt at a shakedown.
And there is not a chance that this will affect his career. Most people aren't interested and the ones that are have the basic amount of gumption required to see it for what it is.
When this is over, all the fuckwits who have been absorbing and believing it will have looong since moved on to the next round of celebrity gossip and forgotten all about it.
None of these things make me less angry, however. I could snap a femur like a wishbone right now.
I know it can't be ignore. The only issue for me is that I don't like acusing anyone without evidence. From what we are told about this scientology crap thing, it could be true they are behind it.
I admit that I'm not aware of much about scientology, or the articles and people who have talked about it, no matter if in a positive or negative way. To be honest I only hear about it when she died because she was part of it. I don't know if that guy is or not cause frankly I didn't read anywhere in the articles about this lawsuit thing that he was. Maybe I missed it out.
Anyway, for me, it doesn't matter because clearly the credibility of scientology has been damage through the last years and again, in court, is that Mark guy who's suing Jim.
grinchy steve wrote:Where? Everywhere. Again, we have a different experience.
Ps: 'Worldwide' is only used in the context of comparison wit the gun-thing. And even lots of haters agree with the fact he can't be held responsible for the suicide. But the hate is because of the STDS, the lies, the letter, the text messages and the dirt digging detectives. Although nobody even knows what's true or not.
grinchy steve wrote:I get what you mean. I understand. But again, I'm not choosing sides. Meaning I won't state anything of the "evidence" thrown around being real or not. Cause I don't know. I hope the best for everyone involved. As it sure isn't a case of black and white.